Columbia University has unraveled into a mere shell of its once distinguished self. In two years, an institution once looked upon as a beacon of intellect and higher education has transformed into a hive riddled with extremism, antisemitism and support for U.S.-designated terrorist organizations.
While students have become the face of the chaos seen on campus, the beating heart is pumped by Columbia’s faculty. They have created a destructive ripple effect that begins with the inaction of Columbia’s administrative leadership and passes through to the professors promoting extremist ideologies in the classroom and at the rallies. The end result has been a campus torn in half by division, hatred and fear.
The actions and intentions of these faculty members cannot be excused under the protection of academic freedom. Professional ethics have been breached on multiple levels.
The continuing rise of antisemitism and terror support at Columbia University is by no means a passing trend. The dire seriousness of the issue was brought to public awareness on January 20, 2025, when President Donald Trump issued an executive order titled, “Protecting the United States from Foreign Terrorists and Other National Security and Public Safety Threats. “
Trump’s new executive order has empowered and enabled the federal government to take action against extremists. In the case that an offending student or faculty member is green card or visa holder, they can be identified and deported for supporting U.S.-designated terrorist organizations or cause chaos on campus.
Columbia’s complete inaction in the face of antisemitism, assaults and property damage, has come with hefty costs. In March 2025, following an investigation by the Federal Antisemitism Task Force, multiple Government agencies cancelled $430 million in grants and contracts to Columbia University.
Today, the prospect of reclaiming Columbia’s reputation as a trusted and respected academic institute lies solely in the hands of its leadership and the actions, they implement against the very individuals compromising its integrity.
Hagop Kevorkian Professor of Iranian Studies and Comparative Literature
Ann Whitney Olin Professor in the Departments of Anthropology and Co-Director of the Center for Palestine Studies
Distorting History to Erase Jewish Identity
Abu-El-Haj’s efforts to undermine the legitimacy of the Jewish people’s historical connection to Israel began with her 2002 book, Facts on the Ground: Archaeological Practice and Territorial Self-Fashioning in Israeli Society. The book accused Israeli archaeologists of fabricating evidence to support Jewish historical claims in the region—an allegation widely condemned as academically dishonest and ideologically motivated. Despite serious criticism, she was controversially awarded tenure in 2007, sparking backlash from academic peers who cited antisemitism, poor scholarship, and politicized research methods. Her academic record reflects a deliberate attempt to rewrite history for ideological purposes.Leading Antisemitic Movements in Academia
Abu-El-Haj has not confined her activism to books. In 2015, she led a campaign at the American Anthropological Association to impose an academic boycott on Israeli institutions—a direct attack on Jewish academic participation under the guise of “solidarity.” While the campaign failed, it confirmed her long-standing role as a central figure in the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) movement, which seeks to delegitimize Israel’s existence.Supporting Terrorism and Justifying Hamas Atrocities
On October 30, 2023, less than a month after Hamas’s October 7 massacre of over 1,200 Israeli civilians, Abu-El-Haj signed an open letter defending Columbia students who attempted to justify the attacks. The letter described the atrocities as “resistance” and a “military response”—language that mirrors Hamas propaganda. Her signature on this statement is not a scholarly stance—it is an endorsement of mass murder, hostage-taking, and the glorification of terror.Faculty Leadership in Columbia’s Pro-Hamas Encampment
Abu-El-Haj was an active participant in Columbia’s pro-Hamas “Gaza Solidarity Encampment,” launched on April 17, 2024. The encampment, organized by Columbia University Apartheid Divest (CUAD), was marked by antisemitic slogans, physical harassment of Jewish students, and the illegal occupation of campus grounds. She appeared:Inciting Hostility Toward Law Enforcement
Rather than calling for accountability, Abu-El-Haj condemned the NYPD’s intervention at Columbia and called for an end to the suspension of students involved in the criminal occupation of Hamilton Hall. Her statements promoted the idea that the rioters were victims rather than perpetrators, further inflaming tensions on campus. In March 2024, she also appeared at a press conference defending Mahmoud Khalil, a Columbia graduate student arrested by ICE with direct ties to Hamas—a student Abu-El-Haj supported publicly despite clear national security implications. She has even equated Israel’s targeting of Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah to the 9/11 terror attacks, showing her willingness to distort international terrorism through the lens of anti-Israel propaganda.Conclusion: A Radical Disguised as a Scholar
Nadia Abu-El-Haj has used her position at Columbia not to educate but to radicalize. Her body of work dismisses historical truth in favor of ideological agendas. Her activism defends terror under the guise of resistance. And her presence at Columbia University has emboldened movements that endanger Jewish students, glorify violence, and erode academic credibility. Columbia must decide whether it will continue to elevate faculty members who distort history, justify terrorism, and fan the flames of antisemitic extremism. Nadia Abu-El-Haj does not belong in the classroom—she belongs in the category of those who abuse scholarship to advance hate. Ann Whitney Olin Professor in the Departments of Anthropology and Co-Director of the Center for Palestine Studies [{"url":"https:\/\/columbia-papers.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/na-tweets-1.png","alt":"Image 1"},{"url":"https:\/\/columbia-papers.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/na-tweets-7-1.png","alt":"Image 2"},{"url":"https:\/\/columbia-papers.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/na-tweets-6-1.png","alt":"Image 3"},{"url":"https:\/\/columbia-papers.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/na-tweets-5-1.png","alt":"Image 4"},{"url":"https:\/\/columbia-papers.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/na-tweets-4-1.png","alt":"Image 5"},{"url":"https:\/\/columbia-papers.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/na-tweets-3-1.png","alt":"Image 6"},{"url":"https:\/\/columbia-papers.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/na-tweets-2-1.png","alt":"Image 7"},{"url":"https:\/\/columbia-papers.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/tweets-8.png","alt":"Image 8"},{"url":"https:\/\/columbia-papers.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/tweets-9.png","alt":"Image 9"}] https://columbia-papers.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/NADIA-ABU-ELHAJ-pic.png []Visiting professor in modern Arab studies at Columbia’s Middle East Institute (MEI)
His Role on Campus
From the earliest days of the October 7 attacks, Abdou embedded himself into the heart of campus unrest. A vocal affiliate of Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP), he not only participated in—but helped lead—illegal, hate-filled encampments and rallies, where calls for Jewish ethnic cleansing and praise for terrorism were rampant. He has used both his lectures and public appearances to inject pro-Hamas propaganda into the academic environment. On May 7, 2024, Abdou appeared in a video posted to X, proudly declaring: “I’ve taught…the last two weeks at the encampment…I actually was the first professor to do that.” This encampment, overrun with antisemitic pamphlets and Hamas glorification, became a staging ground for radicalism on Columbia’s campus—with Abdou playing the role of ideological instructor.Open Allegiance to Hamas
Abdou has not hidden his support for Hamas. He has stated it clearly and repeatedly across multiple platforms. On January 6, 2024, during an interview on Revolutionary Left Radio, he stated plainly: “I might be with Hamas and support the resistance, absolutely.” In a November 30, 2023 interview on the YouTube show Aunty K’s Tarot, Abdou praised Hamas’ fighters: “You don’t need mass movements to change the world. You need a few thousand that are really organized.” He went on to describe the October 7 terrorists as revolutionary heroes: “The resistance fighters within Hamas, who numbered fewer than 1,500, managed to turn the tables not just on a settler-colonial state with no clear borders, but on the entire world.” Just nine days after the October 7 massacre, on October 16, Abdou posted a prayer to social media: “Victory over the oppressors,” — a clear reference to Hamas’ actions.Glorification of Individual Terrorists
Abdou’s admiration for terrorism goes far beyond Hamas. He has celebrated individual attackers with long histories of violence. On November 3, 2023, he posted a tribute to Fatima Bernawi, a Palestinian militant who attempted to bomb a crowded movie theater in Jerusalem in 1967. Abdou praised her as a “Black Palestinian revolutionary,” omitting entirely her role in a foiled terror attack targeting civilians.Hostility Toward America
Incredibly, while employed by one of America’s top universities and teaching its students, Abdou has repeatedly denounced the country and its values. On February 15, 2024, during an event titled “Propaganda and Genocide: Israel’s War on Truth”, Abdou stated: “I don’t pledge allegiance to no American flag. I don’t call myself an American… It’s a white supremacist order.” He further rejected the legitimacy of American civic society: “It ain’t your city! This is indigenous land!... If I was a Jew in Palestine, I would say ‘This is not my land! Either I leave or I stand and fight with the Palestinian people!’” Abdou concluded his remarks by openly defending political violence: “The onset of decolonization is inherently a violent act. There is no undoing the violence.” This rhetoric wasn’t theoretical—he was actively encouraging students to engage in violent struggle, claiming: “I have the power then to go organize with indigenous people and to center them in my life.”Conclusion
Rather than fostering critical thought, Abdou has used his position to promote one-sided propaganda, glorify terrorism, and indoctrinate students into extremist worldviews. His lectures have become platforms for militant messaging—not education. Students under his influence are not challenged to think critically or explore complex issues, but rather are fed a steady diet of radicalism, anti-Americanism, and justification for terror.
His participation in illegal encampments, use of public platforms to promote Hamas, and repeated glorification of political violence directly violate Columbia University’s academic standards and code of conduct. Abdou is not just controversial—he is a clear and present danger to students, the academic environment, and campus safety. Visiting professor in modern Arab studies at Columbia’s Middle East Institute (MEI) [{"url":"https:\/\/columbia-papers.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/ma-tweets-11-1.png","alt":"Image 1"},{"url":"https:\/\/columbia-papers.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/ma-tweets-10-1.png","alt":"Image 2"},{"url":"https:\/\/columbia-papers.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/ma-tweets-9-1.png","alt":"Image 3"},{"url":"https:\/\/columbia-papers.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/ma-tweets-8-1.png","alt":"Image 4"},{"url":"https:\/\/columbia-papers.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/ma-tweets-7-1.png","alt":"Image 5"},{"url":"https:\/\/columbia-papers.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/ma-tweets-6-1.png","alt":"Image 6"},{"url":"https:\/\/columbia-papers.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/ma-tweets-5-1.png","alt":"Image 7"},{"url":"https:\/\/columbia-papers.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/ma-tweets-4-1.png","alt":"Image 8"},{"url":"https:\/\/columbia-papers.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/ma-tweets-3-1.png","alt":"Image 9"},{"url":"https:\/\/columbia-papers.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/ma-tweets-2-1.png","alt":"Image 10"},{"url":"https:\/\/columbia-papers.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/ma-tweets-1-1.png","alt":"Image 11"},{"url":"https:\/\/columbia-papers.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/tweets-15.png","alt":"Mohamed Abdou"},{"url":"https:\/\/columbia-papers.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/tweets-12.png","alt":"Mohamed Abdou"},{"url":"https:\/\/columbia-papers.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/tweets-14.png","alt":"Mohamed Abdou"},{"url":"https:\/\/columbia-papers.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/tweets-13.png","alt":"Mohamed Abdou"}] https://columbia-papers.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/MOHAMED-ABDOU-pic.png []Associate Professor of English and Comparative Literature and Executive Director of the Institute for the Study of Human Rights
Professor of Modern Arab Politics and Intellectual History
Associate Professor in the Department of Classics
Justification of Hamas Terrorism
Assistant Professor of Theater
Edward Said Professor Emeritus of Modern Arab Studies
Since October 7, 2023, the rise of antisemitism at Columbia has been alarming. Based on the testimonies of over 500 Jewish students, the university’s antisemitism task force reported hundreds of detailed incidents of Jewish students being spat on, shoved, pinned against walls, stalked and at times even assaulted. These disturbing incidents coincide with hate rallies where chanting for Jewish ethnic cleansing is a norm.
Antisemitic and terror worship scribbles and tags have become a common site through the halls and in the quad at Columbia. Among the more prominently featured projections of hate are swastikas, homages to Hamas and Sinwar, Intifada and other calls for the ethnic cleansing of Jews and phrases like, “Death to Zionists.”
For the past two years, disruption and disorder has become common place at Columbia. From the illegal encampment that served as a hot bed for extremist rhetoric and Hamas ideology, to the occupation of Hamilton Hall in April 2024. Both extremist students and faculty members have interrupted classes to harass Jewish students and hand out Hamas propaganda and have occupied buildings in Barnard College. Not only has it created a dangerous atmosphere on campus, but it has put a vice on the education of normal students.
Katrina Armstrong, the President of Columbia University, as well as other faculty members have done the bare minimum in terms of disciplinary action. Their meek approach to the extremist on campus has only fueled their destructive behavior. With every boundary broken, President Armstrong releases a statement stacked with empty promises but takes no action. She has even gone as far as to safeguard extremist students on visas, shield them from justice despite their antisemitic remarks and glorification of terror.
A Title VI investigation by the U.S. Department of Education and a lawsuit filed by Jewish students have brought to light Columbia Universitys systemic failure to protect its community. Disturbing incidents, such as physical assaults on Jewish students, the defacement of property with swastikas, and verbal threats, underscore a longstanding issue of antisemitism that has been overlooked by university leadership. Since October 7, 2023, these challenges have intensified, with numerous reports of harassment, intimidation, and violence targeting Jewish students, further highlighting the need for immediate action and accountability.
Columbia University’s tarnished reputation is now reaching beyond its donors and alumni, threatening its global standing as a premier institution. Potential international collaborations, research opportunities, and partnerships with other universities are at risk as Columbia becomes increasingly associated with intolerance and discrimination. Furthermore, ranking organizations, which are often shaped by public perception, may lower Columbia’s standing, further undermining its academic credibility and prestige.
Donor withdrawals from prominent figures such as Robert Kraft, Len Blavatnik, and Leon Cooperman, combined with the ongoing Title VI investigation by the U.S. Department of Education, threaten to significantly undermine Columbia University’s financial stability. The university has already lost $430 million in funding due to the investigation, with more potential losses looming as other donors reconsider their support. Legal costs and possible settlements related to the investigation could add millions to the university’s growing liabilities, further straining its resources and reputation.
The growing climate of hostility at Columbia University has already resulted in incidents of vandalism, harassment, and intimidation. If left unaddressed, this environment is at risk of escalating into physical violence. The unchecked spread of inflammatory rhetoric and disruptive protests has fostered an atmosphere where aggression and conflict could thrive, endangering the safety and well-being of students, faculty, and staff alike.
Talented students and faculty are being driven away by the increasingly hostile environment at Columbia University, further diminishing its intellectual and cultural vibrancy. The university risks a brain drain, with the brightest minds opting for institutions that prioritize inclusivity and safety. This decline in academic and professional talent will inevitably affect the quality of education, research, and innovation at Columbia, leaving the institution struggling to regain its former prestige and standing.
Columbia University stands at a critical juncture. The deterioration of its campus climate is a direct consequence of systemic failures across all levels of administration. This is a call to action for all stakeholders: students, alumni, donors, and federal authorities. We must demand accountability, transparency, and decisive action to eliminate hate and restore Columbia as a beacon of safety, inclusion, and academic excellence.
If Columbia fails to act, its legacy will not be one of leadership and intellectual rigor, but of moral failure and complicity in hate.
If Columbia fails to act, its legacy will not be one of leadership and intellectual rigor, but of moral failure and complicity in hate.